No idea what you're talking about. Do people actually follow all these flimsy politically motivated lawsuits against Trump 24 hours a day?

Attorney-at-Meme eredeti hozzászólása:

No idea what you're talking about. Do people actually follow all these flimsy politically motivated lawsuits against Trump 24 hours a day?

How is $85m a flimsy lawsuit? Trump caused his own loss by bragging about his wealth, so they slapped him with hefty damages. Dude's a grade A clown.

I still have no idea what you're talking about. I don't read media matters are whatever you're into. I've yet to see one lawsuit against him that has any real merit.

Sandakin eredeti hozzászólása:

Attorney-at-Meme eredeti hozzászólása:

No idea what you're talking about. Do people actually follow all these flimsy politically motivated lawsuits against Trump 24 hours a day?

How is $85m a flimsy lawsuit? Trump caused his own loss by bragging about his wealth, so they slapped him with hefty damages. Dude's a grade A clown.

65M of the payout was punitive, meaning it was just the deranged jury's way of sticking it to Trump. Orange man does indeed have a networth of over 7B... so no, hes not hurting.
Btw nobody has been paid yet, you petty little doofus.

Its funny, I can almost predict what youre going to post based of the headlines and trending stories. You have never have anything of value to add, but you just kind of reiterate a left wing consensus and bring it 'here' as if its fact... 'haha you lost' cringe.
The facts, objective truth, is that Trump is on-track for re-election, and none of these trials will matter in a year's time or have the authority to derail his campaign. msm is speculation, fake news, grift, etc. Its red meat intended to rile up and lure the fickle, low info lefty voter base out to the polls and 'save democracy' LOL.

EJean came out with a bogus #MeToo r@pe story... 30 years after the fact.
She takes Trump to (civil) trial and they find him liable, regardless of the lack of evidence or eyewitness testimony; he-said-she-said is literal hearsay.
Later, Trump makes fun of her absurd tale to laughter, thunderous applause, and upvotes.
Yet somehow, Trump gets slapped with defamation?
Not the lady who literally went public with her Trump r@pe fantasy and passed it off as sexual assault?
Idk what happened at Bergdorf Goodman's all those years ago, but Id bet a limb that EJean wasnt sexually assaulted.

Have you seen her interview with Anderson Likes-it-in-the-pooper? Lmfaoo shes lying.
Are you really this big of sucker? Are you this easily getting duped by this breed of shiester to willingly vote for and defend them?


Sandypuss, youre better off not posting anything, it just exposes how little you know about these subjects. Your topics are the sort of tripe you glean off skimming msm news, and thats likely where you get all your information about any of this stuff. Youre prob just some genderfluid shut-in, alienated, lashing out at the world in whatever impotent way he can on your computer.

Oh, that crap? I remember that. Had no idea it's still a thing. I just tend to ignore anything completely absurd and full of TDS.

They/them Democrats have to be the dumbest, most gullible people in the universe.

Attorney-at-Meme eredeti hozzászólása:

No idea what you're talking about. Do people actually follow all these flimsy politically motivated lawsuits against Trump 24 hours a day?

Except it is a civil suit and a jury trial. You can't weaponize the DOJ in a civil suit and you can't claim an entire jury is politically motivated.

I don't get the mentality that Trump never has done anything that he can be sued for because that would mean it's political. Trump has been sued before he entered politics, back when he was donating to both Democrats and Republicans. Were those law suits in the 80's, 90's, 20's politically motivated?


If there is one thing that defines zealot its the belief that their side can never make a mistake and can never do anything wrong,

samplexample eredeti hozzászólása:

he-said-she-said is literal hearsay.

The defamation evidence is not hearsay. Trump admitted to the things he said about E. Jean

hearsay - information received from other peoplethat one cannot adequately substantiate

It is not from other people, it was from a the person who said and then repeated the information when being deposed.

Former President Donald Trump, in brief testimony Thursday in the defamation trial brought by the writer E. Jean Carroll, insisted that his previous recorded statement about the allegations was true and that he did not intend to harm her.

"100 percent," he said when asked if he stood by his deposition in which he called Carroll a liar.

Asked by Alina Habba, his lawyer, if he ever instructed anyone to hurt Carroll, Trump said: "I just wanted to defend myself, my family and, frankly, the presidency."

He admitted to making the statements. His claim is not that it's hearsay, but that there is no defamation because he was defending himself. The rule of law does not allow you to maliciously attack someone because you are "defending yourself". You are confused and thinking that the alleged rape is hearsay. That is also not hearsay because it was first person testimony.

Nixon said "I am not a crook", except for that break in at Watergate. Just because he was defending himself did not mean he was telling the truth.

Sandakin eredeti hozzászólása:

Attorney-at-Meme eredeti hozzászólása:

No idea what you're talking about. Do people actually follow all these flimsy politically motivated lawsuits against Trump 24 hours a day?

How is $85m a flimsy lawsuit? Trump caused his own loss by bragging about his wealth, so they slapped him with hefty damages. Dude's a grade A clown.

its a fake trial.
she lied.
we all know she is insane.
watch her hit on cooper anderson and say that rape is sexy.... shes a liar
NY changed the statues of limitation and then changed it back after he trump filing.
totally legit.... not.

ToastyHabibi710 eredeti hozzászólása:

Sandakin eredeti hozzászólása:

How is $85m a flimsy lawsuit? Trump caused his own loss by bragging about his wealth, so they slapped him with hefty damages. Dude's a grade A clown.

its a fake trial.
she lied.
we all know she is insane.
watch her hit on cooper anderson and say that rape is sexy.... shes a liar
NY changed the statues of limitation and then changed it back after he trump filing.
totally legit.... not.

There's no getting through to people like him. They've been thoroughly indoctrinated by the largest propaganda machine that man has ever seen, and they've never had self-awareness to question it.

I wonder which person you mean. It doesn't matter, because it applies equally to everyone in this thread. Not one person here is not influenced by the propaganda that panders to their beliefs. We all think we are right and that we just can't get others to see the light.

I'm working on it. I play .... what if they're right. It's challenging. I expect exactly 0 other people to do that and everyone to immediately label me as an enemy to their point of view.

johnginnj eredeti hozzászólása:

I wonder which person you mean. It doesn't matter, because it applies equally to everyone in this thread. Not one person here is not influenced by the propaganda that panders to their beliefs. We all think we are right and that we just can't get others to see the light.

I'm working on it. I play .... what if they're right. It's challenging. I expect exactly 0 other people to do that and everyone to immediately label me as an enemy to their point of view.

You probably still think you're the good guys.

Irony...

johnginnj eredeti hozzászólása:

Irony...

hey man what happened to Joe Biden?? i guess i was right.... dude isnt even in control of the White House, let alone oil production.