Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
All the other comparisons are using different scaling options in LS, as far as I know.
As for how it works, well, it's basically a fancy video capture program that only outputs to your display.
You configure it to use a specific upscaler of your preference as well as whether you want frame generation (think like frame interpolation, but spicier), point it to a window, and it'll start grabbing frames the window outputs, and scales them fullscreen to your display exactly as you specified it, as well as generating and displaying in-between frames for improved perceived fluidity if you enabled that.
The appeal of this is that you now have a ton of options for how to scale games that previously had little or none, opening up new options for improving performance or enhancing visuals (in fact, the proprietary LS1 upscaler is actually very good), as well as having a method of frame generation that is not only compatible with just about any program (you can even use it on e.g. YouTube videos) but is totally GPU-agnostic; you don't need any specific brand or series.