Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also all you are doing is saying "these people evil because of (X cherry picked thing) like you could do that to say the Allies during WW2 are evil.
I don't have to be Jewish to believe in self determination, or to not want to repeat the holocaust and support Hitler. I don't know why you would rather push Nazi propaganda rather than just leave Jewish people and Israel alone.
Did humans physically write the Bible? Yes, but as the Bible states, it was inspired directly by God. That is not the equivalent to being "man made" like a Richard Dawkins book. I'm pretty sure the Quran and Torah say similar things about their holy texts too. Regardless, it is an attack on religion to say it's only "man made" as it's discrediting the divinity of that book / religion and relegating it simply to a piece of work by man only.
I never called you an atheist, I said the statement "religion is man made" is an atheist's opinion (I should have used the word "argument" instead); in other words, atheists use that phrase all the time, but yeah, anyone can use it too, atheist or not. ;)
Saying religion is manmade is inherently saying it's false in the case of abrahamic religions. because they assert they aren't manmade.
Buddhism and such is a different story, you can assert they are manmade because the philosophy of said religions is created by a person and adherents of said religion say as much.
So unless you are a buddhist or confuciasit it's safe to say you are an atheist. And even if that is the case, your statement is basically saying Christianity is false. Because Christianity asserts it is NOT man-made religion.
Yet, I'm not an atheist
"Everyone is religious in some form"
That seems even more pushy though, doesn't it? Because on technical terms it is a claim overlooking our human individuality
Also, I never saw anyone trying to discredit religion by stating that it is man made, quite the opposite, I've met religious and semi-religious people that do not have any problem with this statement, and / or recognize it themselves
I am semi-religious (or whatever you want to call it, I don't like this terminology and pinpoint categorization of human views / beliefs so it does not matter to me) myself, and I see nothing wrong with the "man made wonder" statement, never even thought about it discrediting religion in some way xD
No, that's just an atheist's opinion.
One can easily argue that atheism is a man-made religion. The argument that "atheism isn't a religion" is bunk b/c it too relies on faith - faith that no God, gods or supernatural power exists.
Everyone is religious in some form b/c there is a meta-physical aspect to this life that science cannot explain nor measure or quantify. Atheists just don't like to admit that they too have as much faith in their beliefs as a Jew, Muslim, Buddhist, Christian, Agnostic, etc.
On the subject of people pushing religion: that's exactly what atheists do by claiming all religions are man-made. It's to discredit every religion except their own belief of atheism.
No one believes in something, atheist or theist, because they think it's 2nd best.
Also people that push the "my religion = truth, your religion = fake, you HERETIC / HEATHEN"
narrative.
Unfortunately, nobody in history has given religion it's current name more, than religious people themselves, which is just sad, but also natural, we are human beings after all, not perfect in any way, shape or form
Anyways, I think it's not really "propaganda" you're talking about, obviously discrimination is not the way to go, but you have to understand that religion as a whole, probably brought more tragedy to humanity than it did any good, unfortunately.
It's sad, and I wish people were more open-minded towards arguments and ideas that contradict their current ones, at least taking them into consideration before rejecting them
But that's just wishful thinking
However, people tend to use anything they can to benefit their own situation, or to push an agenda, and religion has been the #1 tool used for that, for basically it's entire existence.
I like the general topic of religion, the most interesting aspect of it, to me, is the different religions (and branches of the same one, for example sunni / shia / ibadi islam, or all the branches of christianity) that sprung up in different parts of the world, under different circumstances, unique worldviews and philosophies that are very interesting, at least for me.
I am roman catholic "by birth", but neither me or my family was strict about it, I was always open to learning more about other cultures and the religions that come with them
In reality, if they looked at history, you could point towards Japan killing their own for being christian, or the Boxar Rebellion that killed any chinese that were christian in addition to Europeans in the name of Chinese nationalism and anti-colonialism.
Atheists, but it's really the left in general, are just trying to justify hatred towards X group under the guise of "equality" and "anti-colonialism" or whatever else, when in reality, they are just spreading hate speech against christians.
Atheists do the same thing, they cherry pick parts of history that fit their narrative and ignore the rest or try to argue semantically that it's "not *because* of atheism" even though being against religion was a driving force and point for socialists and communists.
The Crusades for example, are given a bad rep, which is only partially deserved- because yes it was brutal, but so was *all* wars at the time, and the Crusades specifically were a reaction to Muslim aggression
So... religion has had a bad name for the past thousands of years because of... redditors?
Taking the Bible in it's entirety, as it should be taken, points to a particular group of people today (i.e. followers of Jesus).
I'd post a link w/ more info but Steam loves to censor links (or entire messages) related to the Bible/Jesus. Can go to ( gotquestions . org ) and search "Jews saved". First article is the winner ("Are Jews saved b/c they are God's chosen people?").
This delusion of being "chosen" has always been provocative in it's nature, everything has a reason, a root, even hatred, and feeling resentment towards someone that for some borderline schizo reason thinks of himself superior to you, is more than natural in our species.
Ceasing to keep giving religion the same bad name it has been getting for the past hundreds, even thousands of years would seem like a smart thing to do, but apparently many cannot resist the urge to dig an even deeper grave for the entire concept of religion itself.
John 14:6, "Jesus said unto him, “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life; no man cometh unto the Father, but by Me. ""
And Matthew 10:32-33, "Therefore whoever confesses Me [Jesus] before men, him I will also confess before My Father who is in heaven. But whoever denies Me before men, him I will also deny before My Father [God] who is in heaven."
If anyone denies Jesus, be it pagan, atheist or Jew, then they also deny God. The Bible is clear on that. Since Jesus' sacrifice, I'm not sure how a group can deny Jesus (i.e. God) and still be His Chosen People today?