Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The arguments about comparing them against each other is just stupid. The legendary edition is how the games were initially designed to be played, ONE EXPERIENCE.
Besides, the "jank" in ME1 isn't actually bad. It's silly at worst. the mako, with the added booster, is perfectly fine to drive. And the gunplay is also fine.
And as for the ending in 3, with extended cut and enough war assets the ending is actually really good.
ME2 purists are just stupid, the game is good, yes, but the purists have the dumbest takes.
2 was good while its end story was meh and its ability to influence the story though that was par excellence.
the guys who made kotor and mass effect went back to being doctors i believe it was since corporations stole their company essentially.
M3 doesn't have a bad story.... it's just the end most didn't like that doesn't mean the whole story , the rest oif the story was amazing.